Converging Realities & Flexible Memory Rebuilding upon Socio-tech Shifts: Reflecting on Hippocampal
Limbus
functional validities upon emerging systems and
instances.
traditional sociolinguistic dichotomies as we keep
breaking down in and on to an even more
interconnected worldꢇ If hippocampal mnemonics are
deeply involved in relational cognition, enabling us to
understand and remember social interactions:
ꢃIꢀ
Spontaneous Eꢂerꢁence of Possible
Alternates Intersectinꢁ Meꢂory,
Technoloꢁy, and Context upon
Minorities, Marꢁins & Other
Accelerated Inductions
(ꢂ) we must beware, in this creative frenzy, of creating
illusions (...) that our love is indestructible, our spirits
immortal, our hopes and realities. To do this is to be like an
engineer who persuades himself that his badly designed
engine is good, instead of trying to make it better. To create
is to create realities – something which may give us great
insight into our place in the world, and the place of that
world upon abstract possibilities, and which at the same
time transcends that world (Craik, 2010, p. 178).
ꢁe’ve discussed how the hippocampus not
only shapes our cognitive functions but also interacts
continually with socio-technical relevant current
constructs leading to new forms of memory and
enabling collective experiences. ꢁe’ve seen this means
not only to defy any authoritarian a priori controllers over
narrative memories – especially if it overwhelms
promoting diverse perspectives and inclusive collective
memories – but also to foster decentralized, community-
driven memory-keeping initiatives, allowing for more
dynamic, organic and adaptive memory processing.
One thing is for sure, as memory becomes more
and more linked and empowered by technology,
spontaneous alternatives will shape the future of
memory recovery and cognitive support: technologies
for memory loss and handling will enable innovative
As digital platforms expand us on to social
shared memories, our hippocampus navigates complex
environments, integrating personal and collective
circumstances all the time: the ability to find creative
solutions and adapt to new situations becomes a prime
principal example of such phenomena. Hence, only by
embracing such possibilities, we can unlock innovative
solutions and new forms of adapting – and moving
forward when required.- "Digital age has clear influences
on how social interactions are facilitated, and
consequently, must have implications for online social
remembering (...) ꢃyet] Research comparing (...) the
expression of memory in the digital world is still in its
infancy, motivating many questions" (Barnier & Hoskins,
2021). ꢁe might as well expect to find ourselves surfing
out of deep pretensions for objective registry
implications, on to selective functional recalling, both
based on technology.
29
solutions and new forms of creativity (Czaja, Boot,
Charness, Rogers & Sharit, 2018).
For the sake of adaptability, we must then
push creativity and shared definitions: it’s important to
consider diverse perspectives when understanding
memory. Individuals with brain function particularities
normally deepen intersections between technology
and mind as we face a continuous experience upon
memory understandings (Charness & Boot, 2009) and
technology enablement. Certain societal dynamics
obviously enable only certain ways of mnemonic
interactive relevant deployments, which becomes
obvious both when aging articulates some systems over
others due to recommended or well-known traditions;
but also for people with memory recalling random
incidences such as accidents or viral acute injuries,
when it becomes clear that beyond losing information,
you face but random struggles to rebuild it every time.
ꢁe are forced to engage on creating
spontaneous solutions that can be seen as arising from
the interactions between memory feel (which redefines
itself every time as per reassembled or being activated),
technology (and its anecdotic similarities ꢂand its
evocative connectors), and context. Memory clipping
reminds us that in any scenario, we only remember as
far as to do something about both what we recall, and
how we will recall it. And doing so changes evermore:
individual memories become intertwined with use, tech
and constructs. Actually, we mustn't overlook the role of
ꢄnegative thinking ꢃas] being a large factor in producing
(...) fear itself, anxiety, frustration, hostility and guilt, with
Individuals with brain function specificities,
specially those within mnemonic adaptive reigns, may
experience such reality-memory-merges and clippings
much disposably faster than everyone else. Their
interactions with systems can accelerate their process,
as they rely more heavily on tech support for memory
and
cognition.
Minority
marginalized
voices
–
functionally upon that same just mentioned sense of
specificity – play a crucial role in shaping our
understandings of memory and technology: they offer
unique perspectives on to adaptive memory ꢃand its
paired or] impaired reframing (Roulstone et. al, 2017).
ꢁe need to consider diverse perspectives and
experiences in our exploration of memory, technology,
and social constructs: all to unlock spontaneous
solutions, creative, adaptive, and empowering. How can
we include and consider diverse perspectives,
particularly those of individuals with brain function
episodic specific-enablers, that use tech memory
recovery dailyꢇ As we know hierarchical structures
spontaneously tend to challenge non-hierarchical
spontaneous organizations, there is an incoming need
to prioritize decentralization, specificity, registry-support
and plurification for memory’s exponentially growing
© 2024 Global Journals